Gas

The study led by the Potsdam Institute redraws the impact of efforts to limit climate change:«The mix of measures, taxes and incentives is functional»

The words of the former vice president of the United States, who is hosting a "training session" of his organization Climate Reality in Rome these days

The Ember think tank's analysis of how electricity production has changed in European Union countries over the last five years

The United Nations climate summit ended a day late.An agreement has been reached for the first time on the need to abandon fossil fuels

The 197 countries gathered at the UN climate conference in Dubai and the EU delegation welcomed the Global stocktake with applause after long mediation

Final rush of negotiations at the UN climate conference in Dubai.But experts at the Ecco think tank warn:«The text will be rejected, this COP will still be long»

The United States is producing more oil and natural gas today than ever before, and far more than any other country. So, what roles did the Trump-Pence and Biden-Harris administrations play in this surge? The answer might surprise you, given the way each has talked publicly about fossil fuels: former President Donald Trump embracing them, and President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris focusing on reducing fossil fuel use to fight climate change. Under each of the three most recent presidencies, Republican and Democratic alike, U.S. oil and gas production was higher at the end of the administration’s term than at the beginning. That production has both pros and cons. Together, oil and gas account for nearly three-quarters of U.S. energy consumption. Producing oil and gas in the U.S. provides energy security, and high production generally keeps prices down. Burning oil and gas, however, releases carbon dioxide into the air, contributing to climate change. And nat...